White House Adviser Karl Rove will not be indicted in the CIA leak investigation. No Fitzmas now or ever. No Frog-march for Joe Wilson. Now what is the media to do? Hot Air wants to know who in the White House will be blamed for silencing Fitzgerald.
Ha! The MSM will probably blame Rumsfeld. He’s had too many successes of late.
Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has informed top White House adviser Karl Rove that Rove will not face indictment in the CIA-leak investigation, National Review Online has learned. The word came yesterday, when Fitzgerald told Rove lawyer Robert Luskin that he, Fitzgerald, did not plan to seek charges against Rove. This morning, Luskin released a brief statement:
On June 12, 2006, Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald formally advised us that he does not anticipate seeking charges against Karl Rove.
In deference to the pending case, we will not make any further public statements about the subject matter of the investigation. We believe that the Special Counsel’s decision should put an end to the baseless speculation about Mr. Rove’s conduct.
Rove appeared five times before a grand jury investigating the CIA-leak case; the most recent was in April. Before appearing before the grand jury, Rove was interviewed by FBI agents assigned to the investigation. Fitzgerald’s inquiry, it appears, focused most intensely on the first two sessions — the FBI interview and the first grand-jury testimony.
The key question to be resolved by Fitzgerald was said to be whether to charge Rove in connection with his testimony regarding a brief July 11, 2003, conversation with Time magazine’s Matthew Cooper. In both his interview with the FBI and in his first grand jury appearance, Rove did not tell investigators about the conversation with Cooper. By the time Rove appeared for a second time before the grand jury, Rove had discovered evidence — an internal White House e-mail — showing that he did indeed talk to Cooper. Rove gave the evidence to Fitzgerald, who then questioned him about it at length.
Rove is thought to have testified that he simply did not remember the Cooper conversation until he discovered the e-mail. (Cooper himself described the talk as being about two minutes long and occurring right as Rove was leaving on vacation.) Supporting Rove’s contention was the fact that Rove, apparently, testified from the very beginning that he talked to columnist Robert Novak, which suggested he was not trying to hide his involvement in the case from Fitzgerald.
Meanwhile the Rovian Frog-march Brigade still have their heads under their pillows.
John Podhoretz writes that Fitzgerald’s conduct has been disgraceful.
TigerHawk has much more. Hat tip: Powerline News
Trackback URL for this post:
http://www.thewideawakecafe.com/wp-trackback.php?p=1298
2 Comments »
Leave a comment
RSS feed for these comments. |
Trackback URL for this post:
http://www.thewideawakecafe.com/wp-trackback.php?p=1298










This will still the talk once and for alll!
Yeah, right! Heheheee! The Leftists MSM will assume this is politically motivated and that Fitzgerald is hiding something! It ain't over until Rove dies. And that's a mutation of BDS that we all have to suffer.
June 14th, 2006 | #
[...] What will the MSM do? [...]
June 3rd, 2007 | #