The failure of the 911 Commission to investigate Mohammed Atta’s presence in the U.S. six months earlier than previously thought was well planned. The old 9/11 commission was a politician/bureaucratic managed cover up run by several former Clinton administration officials and spineless RINOs. I think it was no accident that Jamie Gorelick was appointed to the commission. No accident that Sandy Berger was caught with “classified documents ” in his pants at the National Archives. This woman’s testimony was disregarded.

They thought they had shredded the sh*t but now it is hitting the fan. (For God’s sake they put stickies on the pictures!)

Still, the old men on the commission are still clinging to their “No fault” conclusions and denying that “Able Danger is the military-intelligence operation that evidently specifically identified the ringleader of the 9/11 attacks, Mohammed Atta, in 2000.They say the briefing the commission staff received from a Navy officer in July 2004 offered no corroborating evidence to support his contention that the U.S. government had known Atta was an Al Qaeda agent, and was living in Brooklyn, more than a year before the attacks.” (from John Podhoretz at The Corner)

They say they didn’t think it was historically significant. I don’t have any confidance that the commission will backtrack to correct the record, especially when they are so busy giving the New York Times their versions of the “truth.”

Who or what were they trying to protect? Certainly not the American people. Who was President in 1999 and 2000? Who was lauded by the press for putting her feminist staff in place at the Pentagon and Justice Department? Who was involved in the selections for the members of the 911 Commission and their staffs?

Jim Geraghty tells us what we know ……..and here is one interesting thought…….

* The 9/11 Commission staffers who felt the information about Able Danger wasn’t worth mentioning to their bosses could, conceivably, be imbeciles. Perhaps, more plausible, is that they had a particular view they wished the report to express, and the Able Danger revelations contradicted that view. Another possibility: These staffers in question didn’t tell Kean, Hamilton, Roemer, or Lehman, but they did tell another member or other members of the Commission, who instructed them to leave it out of the briefings, summaries, and reports given to Kean, Hamilton, Roemer, Lehman, and/or other members. (COUGHgorelickCOUGH*

And possibly, a short circuit in the ouija board…..